Current:Home > reviewsNorth Carolina appeals court upholds ruling that kept Confederate monument in place -Achieve Wealth Network
North Carolina appeals court upholds ruling that kept Confederate monument in place
View
Date:2025-04-27 16:05:36
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A North Carolina appeals court ruled Tuesday that local leaders who refused calls to remove a Confederate monument from outside a county courthouse acted in a constitutional manner and kept in place the statue at its longtime location in accordance with state law.
The three-judge panel unanimously upheld a trial court judge’s decision to side with Alamance County and its commissioners over the 30 foot (9.1 meter)-tall statue, which features a Confederate infantryman perched at the top. The state NAACP, the Alamance NAACP chapter, and other groups and individuals had sued the county and its leaders in 2021 after the commissioners rejected calls to take the statue down.
Confederate monuments in North Carolina, as elsewhere nationwide, were a frequent focal point for racial inequality protests in the late 2010s, and particularly in 2020 following the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer. North Carolina legislators enacted a law in 2015 that limits when an “object of remembrance” such as a military monument can be relocated.
The lawsuit’s plaintiffs said the county and the commissioners violated the state constitution by exercising discriminatory intent to protect a symbol of white supremacy outside the historic Alamance County Courthouse, thus creating the appearance of racial prejudice there.
In the opinion, Court of Appeals Chief Judge Chris Dillon wrote that the county commissioners lacked authority under the 2015 law to remove the statue. He also said the county manager’s email to commissioners in June 2020, in which he asked them to consider removing the monument out of concern for protesters’ safety, did not qualify for an exception to that law.
“At all times, the Monument Protection Law required the County to leave the Monument in its current place,” Dillon wrote. He added that a provision in the state constitution intended to ensure state courts are open to the public doesn’t prohibit the placement of objects of historical remembrance in and around a courthouse. The courthouse monument was dedicated in 1914.
“Indeed, in many courthouses and other government buildings across our State and nation, there are depictions of historical individuals who held certain views in their time many today would find offensive,” Dillon wrote.
Judges Donna Stroud and Valerie Zachary joined in the opinion.
Even with the 2015 law, Confederate monuments in North Carolina have been taken down in recent years, sometimes through force.
In 2018, protesters tore down a Confederate statue known as “Silent Sam” at the University of North Carolina campus at Chapel Hill. Statues of soldiers from the North Carolina Confederate Monument on the old Capitol grounds in Raleigh came down in June 2020. Gov. Roy Cooper, citing public safety, directed that the remainder of the monument and two others on Capitol grounds be removed.
The state Supreme Court is currently considering litigation stemming from a 2021 decision by the Asheville City Council to dismantle an obelisk honoring Civil War-era Gov. Zebulon Vance.
veryGood! (954)
Related
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- He's trying to fix the IRS and has $80 billion to play with. This is his plan
- This company adopted AI. Here's what happened to its human workers
- Does Michael Jordan Approve of His Son Marcus Dating Larsa Pippen? He Says...
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Fossil Fuels Aren’t Just Harming the Planet. They’re Making Us Sick
- An African American Community in Florida Blocked Two Proposed Solar Farms. Then the Florida Legislature Stepped In.
- Gymshark's Huge Summer Sale Is Here: Score 60% Off Cult Fave Workout Essentials
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Daniel Radcliffe Reveals Sex of His and Erin Darke’s First Baby
Ranking
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- As SpaceX Grows, So Do Complaints From Environmentalists, Indigenous Groups and Brownsville Residents
- Warming Trends: A Possible Link Between Miscarriages and Heat, Trash-Eating Polar Bears and a More Hopeful Work of Speculative Climate Fiction
- Tucker Carlson says he'll take his show to Twitter
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- This company adopted AI. Here's what happened to its human workers
- Amid a child labor crisis, U.S. state governments are loosening regulations
- CNN's town hall with Donald Trump takes on added stakes after verdict in Carroll case
Recommendation
Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
Why does the U.S. have so many small banks? And what does that mean for our economy?
Space Tourism Poses a Significant ‘Risk to the Climate’
Hard times are here for news sites and social media. Is this the end of Web 2.0?
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
Tory Burch 4th of July Deals: Save 70% On Bags, Shoes, Jewelry, and More
Activists Laud Biden’s New Environmental Justice Appointee, But Concerns Linger Over Equity and Funding
From the Middle East to East Baltimore, a Johns Hopkins Professor Works to Make the City More Climate-Resilient